This examine provides an method of metaphor that systematically takes contextual elements under consideration. It analyses how metaphors either rely on, and alter, the context within which they're uttered, and particularly, how metaphorical interpretation comprises the articulation of asserted, implied and presupposed fabric. It vitamins this semantic research with a practice-based account of metaphor on the conceptual point, which stresses the function of sociocultural elements in inspiration formation.
Read Online or Download Contexts of Metaphor (Current Research in the Semantics Pragmatics Interface) PDF
Similar semantics books
"The present study within the Semantic / Pragmatics Interface" (CRiSPI) sequence has carved out a brand new and colourful region of analysis. This quantity bargains the reader a cutting-edge checklist of latest and verified study during this sector. Von Heusinger and Turner's cautious number of subject matters and individuals guarantees that every bankruptcy integrates semantic and pragmatic proof right into a unmarried conception, that every unearths an sufficient department of theoretical labour and that every makes an attempt to layout and corroborate a sublime account of which means and use that will be appropriate with different features of human behaviour.
This e-book argues that certain descriptions ('the table', 'the King of France') consult with contributors, as Gottlob Frege claimed. This it seems that basic end flies within the face of philosophical orthodoxy, which contains Bertrand Russell's conception that sure descriptions are units of quantification.
This publication engages with deictics ('pointing' phrases like here/there, this/that) of house. It makes a speciality of texts by means of Donne, Shakespeare, Spenser, and Wroth particularly, bearing on their varieties of deixis to cultural and regular advancements; however it additionally indicates parallels with either iconic and overlooked texts from a number later ancient classes.
Semiotics has had a profound influence on our comprehension of a variety of phenomena, from how animals symbolize and converse, to how humans learn television ads. This sequence positive factors books on semiotic thought and purposes of that thought to realizing media, language, and similar topics. The sequence publishes scholarly monographs of huge attract scholars and non-specialists in addition to students.
- Quantifiers and Cognition: Logical and Computational Perspectives
- Information Structure and Sentence Form: Topic, Focus, and the Mental Representations of Discourse Referents
- Typological Studies: Word Order and Relative Clauses
- Secondary Predication and Adverbial Modification: The Typology of Depictives
Additional info for Contexts of Metaphor (Current Research in the Semantics Pragmatics Interface)
L. D. Ross's English edition of Organon (1928) and Rhetoric (1924). , Stutterheim, Vahlen, Lucas, Ricoeur, and Cooper), I will only refer to them incidentally, to avoid an inordinate lengthening of this section. 32 Contexts of Metaphor a good metaphor, what happens to the meanings of the words involved in figurative speech, and whether metaphors can be true. Some of these questions are discussed in Book III of the Rhetoric (1404b25ff), which deals with prose language used for convincing an audience in debate.
Still, the way we look at it, the log has to be there. " (Luria 1976: 58-59) The last remark is particularly revealing: even when explicitly presented with an appropriate abstract categorial term, illiterate peasants would typically reject it as irrelevant, and at times even as false. They were equally unwilling, for example, to classify both fish and crows as animals. Their classifications thus appear to have a functional rather than taxonomic character. One might surmise that the same persons would feel equally comfortable in classifying a log of wood together with, say, a stove, a furnace, and a fireplace,- items that belong together functionally, though not categorially.
I would suggest: much like literal language. In context, a sentence which literates would rank as deviant or figurative on the basis of some categorial anomaly may be just as acceptable to individuals in an oral society as ones we would consider fully literal. No real or apparent category mistake at the level of literal meaning is involved, because there are no fixed and stable literal meanings and categories to begin with. This is not, of course, to deny the existence of linguistic norms of correctness in oral societies.