By Michiel Leezenberg
This research offers an method of metaphor that systematically takes contextual elements under consideration. It analyses how metaphors either depend upon, and alter, the context within which they're uttered, and particularly, how metaphorical interpretation consists of the articulation of asserted, implied and presupposed fabric. It vitamins this semantic research with a practice-based account of metaphor on the conceptual point, which stresses the position of sociocultural elements in suggestion formation.
Uploader liberate Notes:
Scanned PDF, contains bookmarks & OCR/searchable text
Read Online or Download Contexts of Metaphor PDF
Similar semantics books
"The present examine within the Semantic / Pragmatics Interface" (CRiSPI) sequence has carved out a brand new and colourful quarter of analysis. This quantity deals the reader a cutting-edge checklist of latest and proven learn during this quarter. Von Heusinger and Turner's cautious choice of issues and individuals guarantees that every bankruptcy integrates semantic and pragmatic proof right into a unmarried thought, that every reveals an enough department of theoretical labour and that every makes an attempt to layout and corroborate a chic account of that means and use that will be suitable with different facets of human behaviour.
This e-book argues that yes descriptions ('the table', 'the King of France') confer with members, as Gottlob Frege claimed. This it appears basic end flies within the face of philosophical orthodoxy, which includes Bertrand Russell's conception that yes descriptions are units of quantification.
This e-book engages with deictics ('pointing' phrases like here/there, this/that) of area. It specializes in texts by means of Donne, Shakespeare, Spenser, and Wroth particularly, pertaining to their types of deixis to cultural and known advancements; however it additionally indicates parallels with either iconic and missed texts from more than a few later historic classes.
Semiotics has had a profound impression on our comprehension of a variety of phenomena, from how animals characterize and speak, to how humans learn television advertisements. This sequence beneficial properties books on semiotic conception and functions of that concept to realizing media, language, and comparable topics. The sequence publishes scholarly monographs of extensive attract scholars and non-specialists in addition to students.
- Semantic Processing for Finite Domains
- English Lexicogenesis
- The Anatomy of Meaning: Speech, Gesture, and Composite Utterances
- Proper Names: A Millian Account
Additional info for Contexts of Metaphor
2 Aristotle thus assumes an isomorphism between linguistic terms, mental entities, and things. Because of this isomorphism, referentialist and conceptualist views of metaphor would seem to collapse on his treatment; his remarks in different places are equally germane to both views. It would be somewhat 1 in fact, the only place where Aristotle does seem to express a clearly referentialist view is Topica (140a9): 'metaphor somehow makes the signified object known because of similarity; for all who metaphorize do so according to some similarity' (emph.
Aristotle postulates that metaphors employed in the distinguished language of tragedy and other forms of poetry should be 'uncommon' (1458a21ff), not that metaphors in general are in any way out of the ordinary. I will return to this in the discussion of the Rhetoric below. In other words, 'current' as characterized in Chapter 21 does not seem to be opposed to 'metaphorical', let alone to 'figurative'. Next, Aristotle generically defines metaphora as a 'transfer of a name belongingelsewhere' (1457b8).
Aristotle 37 One remark in Chapter 22 of the Poetics has widely been taken as evidence that Aristotle holds a referentialist view: he says that the gift for appropriate (πρεπη) metaphor cannot be learned from others, because 'to metaphorize well is to observe the similar' (1459a8). 1 The central question is precisely which are the elements of the analogon-relation A : B = C : D. Are they the words themselves, the referents of the terms used, or the concepts expressed by the words? Aristotle nowhere explictly says which one of these is involved, nor does he distinguish them by typographical or other means, so the matter is not easy to decide.