By Francois Recanati, Isidora Stojanovic, Neftali Villanueva
This quantity brings jointly unique papers through linguists and philosophers at the function of context and point of view in language and proposal. a number of contributions are focused on the contextualism/relativism debate, which has loomed huge in contemporary philosophical discussions. In a considerable advent, the editors survey the sector and map out the correct matters and positions.
Read Online or Download Context-Dependence, Perspective and Relativity PDF
Best semantics books
"The present examine within the Semantic / Pragmatics Interface" (CRiSPI) sequence has carved out a brand new and colourful quarter of study. This quantity deals the reader a cutting-edge checklist of recent and verified study during this region. Von Heusinger and Turner's cautious number of issues and individuals guarantees that every bankruptcy integrates semantic and pragmatic proof right into a unmarried thought, that every unearths an enough department of theoretical labour and that every makes an attempt to layout and corroborate a chic account of that means and use that will be suitable with different features of human behaviour.
This booklet argues that yes descriptions ('the table', 'the King of France') confer with members, as Gottlob Frege claimed. This it seems that uncomplicated end flies within the face of philosophical orthodoxy, which contains Bertrand Russell's idea that convinced descriptions are units of quantification.
This publication engages with deictics ('pointing' phrases like here/there, this/that) of house. It specializes in texts by means of Donne, Shakespeare, Spenser, and Wroth specifically, concerning their varieties of deixis to cultural and typical advancements; however it additionally indicates parallels with either iconic and overlooked texts from more than a few later old classes.
Semiotics has had a profound impression on our comprehension of a variety of phenomena, from how animals represent and converse, to how humans learn television advertisements. This sequence positive factors books on semiotic idea and purposes of that conception to realizing media, language, and comparable matters. The sequence publishes scholarly monographs of extensive entice scholars and non-specialists in addition to students.
- Dialogue Games: An Approach to Discourse Analysis
- Perspectives on Semantics, Pragmatics, and Discourse: A Festschrift for Ferenc Kiefer
- Time, Tense and Aspect in Early Vedic Grammar
- The Handbook of Discourse Analysis
Additional info for Context-Dependence, Perspective and Relativity
5 The distinction between thoughts and utterances being about entities and their merely concerning entities requires us to draw a corresponding distinction between two sorts of content. When a Z-lander thinks an it is raining thought, his thought concerns, but is not about, Z-land. So what are we to say with regard to the content of this thought? In one sense the content of the thought includes only those entities the thought is about, and in this sense the content is not a truth-conditional proposition containing Zland, but rather a propositional function whose value for the argument Zland is a full truth-conditional proposition whose truth value depends upon the weather in Z-land.
So, it will not do to maintain that in reporting beliefs we are always interested only in their aboutness-content. A natural suggestion to make at this point would be to acknowledge that in making a belief report we are (usually) interested in the fullypropositional concerning-content of the belief, but to reject the assumption made in Crimmins and Perry’s (1989) analysis that a belief report must 30 Lenny Clapp tacitly refer to a notion or idea of every constituent of this propositional content.
Note, however, that the compromise analysis of belief reports has excised some of resources that were posited for the purpose of solving the doxastic puzzles. That is, according to Crimmins and Perry (1989) the explanation of why utterances of (1) and (2) have different truth conditions, despite the fact that the utterances attribute belief in the same proposition to the same subject, is that the speaker tacitly refers to different notions (and ideas) that the subject uses to represent this proposition.